Baby Wyvern Disapeared When I Logged Back on

You know about how individuals proceeds command of the ability of the State and then abuse that power like former U.s. President George "Dubya" Bush-league?  "Dubya" started a state of war in Republic of iraq which was highly assisting for some US businesses.  He achieved this b y claiming Republic of iraq had a nuclear weapons programme which was a serious earth security threat when Iraq did non and when it had already been bombed into oblivion past the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush-league UK The Telegraph By Chrissy Iley fifteen February 2011.

Recall how Bush was supported by UK Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to join the United states with faked "intelligence" of Republic of iraq's weapons of mass devastation which did not exist but which Blair claimed could be deployed within 40 minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If you recollect that then yous will know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Observe how they persuade us we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they tin save us all if we trust them?

This trickery is not new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this day.

On CHS we wrote previously about how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that bluntly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the disease came about as a result of the interaction of three completely different factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, particularly nutrition and sanitation. The effect cannot be owing to the smallpox vaccine – whatsoever vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to have:

Modest Pox – Big Prevarication – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

At that place was a nasty disease called smallpox and it did kill people long agone.

This was especially the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for breeding and spreading disease: London's first park congenital after rich feared disease spread from slums Great britain The Independent By Andy McSmith Friday 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The middle and upper classes needed to be reassured the Land would keep them safe from the threat of disease.  The bulk of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could reach this by ensuring the then truly "cracking unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the illness controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth simply the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not piece of work and sometimes killed equally many or more than the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" all the same contracted the disease: Smallpox Mortality, Great britain, U.s.a., Sweden.

At present you tin read a relatively short but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX Bloodshed- Uk, USA & SWEDEN

In the graphs beneath detect the large numbers of deaths acquired by the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the UK, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the illness dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished past vaccination, every bit the medical "consensus" view tells usa. Whatsoever vaccine which takes 100 years to "piece of work" did not.  On any scientific assay of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the pass up in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the residual of the Uk and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox expiry rates plummeted [see table below].  Leicester'southward arroyo also price far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Entire Book every bit .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

Tabular array 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name.	Period.	Pocket-size-Pox.  Cases	Small-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Nippon	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.viii
British Army (United Kingdom)	1860-1908	1,355	96	7.1
British Ground forces (India)	1860-1908	2,753	307	11.1
British Ground forces (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	8.8
Royal Navy	1860-1908	two,909	234	8.0
Thousand Totals and case fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.3
Leicester (since giving up vaccination)	1880-1908	ane,206	61	5.1

Biggs said "In this comparing, I accept given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, so that they may be compared either way with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist linguistic communication, may I ask, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Army, and of the Imperial Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical study were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding consequence—but on the opposite side."

TABLE 29.

Pocket-size-Pox Epidemics, Price, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Minor-Pox Cases	Pocket-size-Pox Deaths	Fatality-charge per unit Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	1,594	sixteen.l	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	eleven.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	7,066	688	nine.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	xxx	4.x	£1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Doctor

– Baronial 27, 2013

With the approaching influenza flavor and the enthusiastic calls to use the flu vaccine, y'all might exist wondering where the idea of vaccination got its outset. Where did the thought of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an attempt to provide protection against contagious disease begin?

Many medical and history books present a simple tale of the origin of vaccination. Nigh present the aforementioned basic tale of the brilliant observation of a uncomplicated country doctor and his courage in attempting to thwart a deadly and frightening disease of that time – smallpox, or as it was ofttimes called the speckled monster. In a recent and popular book, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an eight-year sometime boy named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes's cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps'southward hands. The boy came downwards with a slight fever, simply cypher more. Afterward, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a full-blown, albeit balmy, case of the illness. Null happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox over again; again, nothing. [1]

Edward Jenner's idea eventually became known equally vaccination, which is derived from the Latin word for cow – vacca. Information technology was originally referred to as cowpoxing, but eventually the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in place, smallpox would be tamed and the world would exist freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not unlike the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the kid-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly serpent-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a simple and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors claim that with vaccination in place, "billions of lives" have been saved.[ii]

Simply legendary heroes, specially those that are used to support a belief, reach an iconic condition while whatsoever unsavory aspects virtually the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using small amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the arms of healthy people. This idea was introduced to the Western world by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the do of inoculation against smallpox, known as variolation. This type of inoculation was simply a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a fourth dimension and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do better against the affliction than if they contracted it at some possibly less desirable time and place in the future.

The idea was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically practiced. Merely considering of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an operation that could only be afforded by the wealthy.[3] The procedure did often help protect the individual that was inoculated, just there was still an estimated two-5% that died as a upshot.[4,5] Still, this was an improvement compared to a 20-25% bloodshed rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] But, was the divergence in mortality due to inoculation alone? Or could it have had something to practise with the fact that the wealthy had better access to more nutritious food and a cleaner environment than the majority of lodge?

There was one major and by and large unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than there would have been naturally. In a 1764 article the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious affliction and that the practice of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years later on, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯non decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse problems, because it caused more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably similar the plague a contagious disease, what tends to finish the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increment that danger; the practice of Inoculation apparently tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious disease is produced by Inoculation where it would non otherwise have been produced; the place where it is thus produced becomes a center of contagion, whence information technology spreads non less fatally or widely than it would spread from a eye where the illness should happen in a natural way; these centers of contagion are manifestly multiplied very greatly past Inoculation . . .[7]

Even so, while the popularity of variolation varied, the trouble of information technology spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had become a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically continued by most of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox continued to exist spread by this medically-sanctioned procedure.

Now enters the hero of our legend. It was rumored amongst milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect one from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an eight-yr-former boy named James Phipps. He took disease thing that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He later deliberately exposed the child to smallpox equally a exam to encounter if he was protected past the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did not contract clinical smallpox, it was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with only rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the utilise of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be immune to smallpox, there were doctors of the fourth dimension who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a coming together of the Medico-Convivial Order, Jenner was ridiculed over his practice.

But he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where minor-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [8]

From the beginning in that location were problems with Jenner'south process. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox thing obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were so tested by being inoculated with smallpox to see if the cowpox process had been effective. All of them adult smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the report just decided to ignore the results because they were not in support of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was quickly embraced by many in the medical profession as the respond to combating smallpox. By 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the conventionalities that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical community continued to embrace Jenner'due south ideas amid numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were yet dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Child was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the end of the twelvemonth 1799. A calendar month later it was inoculated with small-pox matter without effect, and a few months afterward took confluent small-pox and died. 2. A woman-retainer to Mr. Gamble, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the coincidental way from milking. 7 years afterwards she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she defenseless small-pox, and died. 3 and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, three years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted small-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . 13. The kid of Mr. R died of small-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were bodacious of its security. The vaccinator'southward name was concealed. 14. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam'south office . . . died of pocket-sized-pox a year subsequently vaccination.[10]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was not living upwards to its promise to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[xi] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an xviii% fatality rate and is substantially the same fatality rate every bit smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This high fatality rate forth with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct challenge to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Another article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Modest Pox, who accept previously undergone Vaccination by the most proficient practitioners, is at present alarmingly groovy.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with 30 years of feel in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice." But after vaccinating one,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His feel was that, after vaccination, people however could contract and fifty-fifty die from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the practice.[13]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the time were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a trend to embrace it as a new form of income. It is therefore quite significant for a md to have spoken out against it as Dr. Chocolate-brown did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could still infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could too be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, 1, and, 2 [1820-1822] at that place was a great hubbub most the small-pox. It broke out with the great epidemic to the north . . . It pressed close to home to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had small-pox before, and ofttimes severely; near to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some alone, only fell upon not bad numbers.[14]

William Cobbett was a farmer, journalist, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote almost the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to exist an unproven and fraudulent medical do. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed by JENNER HIMSELF, accept taken the real small-pox afterwards, and have either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]

During this fourth dimension vaccine material was the "humanized" form, which meant that material was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the side by side person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, merely as failures increased there was a belief that the vaccine had lost its original supposed authority, and there were calls to obtain fresh material straight from cows.[sixteen]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine material came from cows, Jenner actually believed the material originated from an infectious condition of horses chosen the "grease." From this and other behavior, there were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was simply smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow fabricated into a new disease.[eighteen] This faulty conventionalities would outcome in the cosmos of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a man who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a cow's udder. He then took pus from that cow and used information technology to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[nineteen] A later inquiry determined that this was nothing more than the old practice of smallpox inoculation.[20]

Not just was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, just there were also reports of deaths from other causes shortly later vaccination. For instance, a pare condition called erysipelas was a especially prolonged and painful way to die.

. . . a male child from Somers-town, aged 5 years, "small-scale-pox confluent, unmodified (ix days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of iv months; one cicatrix . . . the married woman of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (8 days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; 2 good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, anile x weeks, and the son of a sugar baker, anile thirteen weeks, died of "general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the encephalon."[21]

Considering arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could be spread causing diverse epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke before the Academy at Paris.

Kickoff I rejected the idea that syphilis could be transplanted by vaccination. But facts accumulated more and more than, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by ways of the vaccine. I exercise this very reluctantly. At present I do not hesitate longer to admit and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

Every bit it became increasingly articulate throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what it was promised to be, refusals increased. In social club to deal with this, the judicial system intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a ready of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did nothing to adjourn the problem of smallpox. Information from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the slap-up 1872 epidemic. Later 1855, there were farther smallpox epidemics in 1859-60, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the most astringent smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted past Massachusetts in 1855 had no effect at all (Graph 1). In fact, more people died in the xx years afterwards the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the twenty years before.

Graph i: Boston smallpox mortality rate from 1841 to 1880.

By this indicate, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less probable to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were then made for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, at that place were those that spoke out against the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent physician of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were being made past vaccinators. Immense financial gain combined with the force of law created the perfect environment that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators accept received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 alone they amounted to £54,727, and in the present twelvemonth they will get well-nigh a quarter million. Other sums, also, which I cannot proper name, have been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a quack remedy produced so much proceeds?

[26]

In England, governmental command strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. Even so, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A great pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, fifty-fifty those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war there were twenty-three thousand iv hundred and sixty-nine cases of small-scale-pox in that army. The London Lancet of July 15, 1871 said:

Of nine thousand three hundred and ninety-ii small-pox patients in London hospitals, half-dozen thousand eight hundred and l-iv had been vaccinated. Seventeen and one-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole country more than than i hundred and twenty-two thousand vaccinated persons accept suffered from small-scale-pox . . . Official returns from Germany show that between 1870 and 1885 one million vaccinated persons died from small-scale-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine rubber, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and liberty through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine movement. People began to resist the authorities and chose to pay fines. Some even accustomed imprisonment rather than assuasive vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the neat demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That aforementioned yr Leicester's government, which had pushed for vaccination through the utilize of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a inexpensive and effective means that eliminated the need for vaccination. However, there were dire predictions from the majority of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination rate would outcome in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the bulk of the town's residents were steadfast in their conventionalities that vaccination was not necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually exist plagued with disaster never did come up to pass. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed equally the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an heart-opener to the people and an eye-sore to the pro-vaccinists the world over. Hither is a corking manufacturing town having a population of nearly a quarter of a meg, which has demonstrated by a crucial exam of an experience extending over a period of more than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to small-pox and far less afflicted by that affliction since it abandoned vaccination than it was at a time when ninety-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was often promoted equally a condom process, information technology oft acquired sickness or even expiry. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than one,600 in England (Graph 3). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph four).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox bloodshed rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph 3: England and Wales full deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the terminate of the 1800s, smallpox changed its character. After the summertime of 1897, the astringent type of smallpox with its high death charge per unit, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the U.s.. Smallpox turned from a disease that killed 1 in 5 of its victims to one that only killed anywhere from 1 in l and afterward to equally low every bit ane in 380. The disease could all the same kill, but having become so much milder, information technology was frequently mistaken for various other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the Southward and later gradually spread over the state. The mortality was very low and it [smallpox] was usually at first mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 article in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox expiry rate was around 20%, every bit it had been historically. The table also showed that after 1896 the death charge per unit roughshod off chop-chop, starting with 6% in 1897 to as low equally 0.26% by 1908. As the mild course of smallpox replaced the classic type, smallpox could be difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this time, considered a mild illness of babyhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a pocket-sized communicable disease of childhood, and is chiefly of import because it often gives ascension to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s it was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced trivial in the way of symptoms, fifty-fifty though few had been vaccinated.

Private cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although at that place has been no protection by vaccination, the grade of the affliction is extremely mild. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the constitutional symptoms mild or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely depression vaccine coverage rate, at that place was never a resurgence of smallpox. Fifty-fifty though smallpox was not a major consequence, the practise of smallpox vaccination continued from the time of the concluding smallpox expiry in the The states in 1948 upwardly until 1963. This resulted in an estimated five,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 study detailed the cases of 9 children in which ii died of a pare condition due to vaccination, now being termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated by the authors to be between 1 in 20,000 to one in 100,000 with a fatality rate of 4 to 40%.[35] Nonetheless, they acknowledged that about cases were not reported and there was no accurate accounting on this result of vaccination. There were also an estimated 200 to 300 deaths as the effect of smallpox vaccination, while during the same fourth dimension there had merely been 1 smallpox decease in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox expiry in the United States post-obit an importation occurred in 1948, but since that time there have been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is nevertheless occurring today, equally recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his armed forces begetter after the father was vaccinated. Subsequently a prolonged admission, and a week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother too required treatment and virus was found all over the house.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 study thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually have been fifty-fifty higher. This study only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the U.s.. If the deaths were this high in a country with a mod health-intendance system, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present beyond the entire world?

There were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. We are ashamed to jettison the idea completely and perhaps afraid that if we did the accident of some future epidemic might put us in the wrong. Nosotros prefer to let compulsory vaccination die a natural death and are relieved that the general public is not curious enough to demand an inquest. In the meantime our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this fourth dimension with vaccination as virtually the only medically promoted way to deal with disease, in that location were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common nutrient product that is made through fermentation of a variety of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. Thou. Oliphant, M.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the use of Acetic acid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" as applied to small pox. Dr. Roth starting time claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more reliable every bit a prophylactic in small-pox than Belladonna in carmine fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the ill and to the exposed two tabular array-spoonfuls of vinegar, subsequently breakfast and at evening, for fourteen days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the safe treatment died, while among those nether ordinary treatment the mortality was as usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar's ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to have intendance of other people with smallpox without fear of contracting the disease. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Once more, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar as a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other blazon of vinegar should exist used three or four times a day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Society, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the nifty men who for a century past have been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the front in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Any person who has been exposed need accept no fear of smallpox if he will take 2 or 3 tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or four times a day." The discussion may now be regarded every bit closed, and smallpox at last is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem light-headed, but but considering most people have been conditioned to accept the age-old prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected creature's (usually a cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the homo arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier at present?

Scurvy is a affliction that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or but an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of salubrious collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in skin, bones, and blood vessels and likewise gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is not able to generate acceptable collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar holding cells together and, as a result, literally comes unglued and falls autonomously.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Section of King's College, described the poor diet of gold miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fatty, coffee, and alcohol while working long, hard days under the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gold miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living almost entirely upon fried bacon or fatty pork and flour made into batter-cakes, and fried in the fat, which completely saturates it. This is done down with copious librations of strong coffee, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, under a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same time subjected to the well-nigh intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gilded Blitz of the mid-1800s, an estimated ten,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Civil War twice as many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in boxing.[44] For instance, the causes of decease listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy directly accounted for at least two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next mutual crusade of death, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for only a small fraction. Those who were killed in actual battle or who died as a result of their wounds accounted only for 1 percent of the total deaths.

Other large infectious killers such equally scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (also known as pertussis) all greatly declined during this time to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild childhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive decline of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were bachelor (Graph 5 & half dozen).

Graph 5: England and Wales whooping cough bloodshed rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph 6: England and Wales measles mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a state medico making a discovery that saved the world from the destruction of smallpox is a fundamental medical belief that continues to be echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine religion. Just the truthful history shows u.s.a. a different reality.

The brand name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the globe psyche as something to protect someone from an affliction. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of disease matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific affliction. The reality of vaccination is zilch close to the myth.

Other extremely effective culling methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and accept since vanished from societal collective retentiveness. Instead nosotros were left with the mythical history of Jenner'southward cracking discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the proper name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the curtain has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, do more than and more vaccines seem like a good idea to you?

More information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping coughing, and lost remedies can exist found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's book "Dissolving Illusions" which can be found on amazon.com

Bibliography:
1.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
2.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
3.Victor C. Vaughan, MD, Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
iv.Frederick F. Cartwright, Disease and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
five.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present State of the British Settlements of North-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
half dozen.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Nihon, Stanford Academy Printing, 2007, p.179.
7."The Exercise of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman's Magazine and Historical Chronicle, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Case Against Vaccination, Goddard's Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
nine.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
10.William Scott Tebb, MD, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination past Human activity of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. Eight, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
thirteen.Mr. Thomas Dark-brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Book Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
14."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. Two, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Advice to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
16.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present State of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and periodical of practical medicine, vol. twenty, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. 4, 1834, p. 796.
19.Ephraim Cutter, MD, "Partial Report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the United states of america," Transactions of the American Medical Association, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
xx.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Relate, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Health in the State of New York and Massachusetts," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. 4, February 1909, p. 50-51.
24."Small-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Periodical, vol. CIV, no. six, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Sentry, Apr 1911, vol. nineteen, no. four, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.1000. Due west. Harman, MD, "A Medico's Argument Confronting the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Brief: A Monthly Journal of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June ane, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, April 16, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. W. Hodge, Dr., "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Not by the Propagation of Affliction," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. fifteen.
31.J. W. Hodge, MD, "How Modest-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. III, no. xvi, Jan, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles V. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious Disease equally Shown by the History of Smallpox in the United States," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. xiii, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the practice of preventive medicine, C.V. Mosby Visitor, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Price Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume 1, W.B. Saunders Visitor, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds Medico and Howard A. Joos MD, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, August 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. 10.
38.Maggie Fox, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological dorsum-number," Lancet, January ane, 1938, pp. 48-49.
40."Acetic Acid in Ruby Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. 1, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Foreclose Smallpox," The Critique, January 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Journal of Medicine, vol. VI, no. 1, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of King'due south College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Study of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), Nov 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Wellness Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Harm, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, government, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine courtroom, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines |

Baby Wyvern Disapeared When I Logged Back on

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share :